A federal circuit court has overturned an SEC rule, adopted in August 2010, that would have required public companies to include in their proxy materials stockholder nominees for election as director. The SEC had stayed effectiveness of the rule pending the outcome of this litigation.
Subject to limitations, the rule would have required a company to name in its proxy materials, as a candidate for election by stockholders, an individual nominated by persons holding, for at least three years, at least 3% of a company's voting stock. Any individual so elected would displace a nominee proposed by the board.
The court invalidated the rule because it held the SEC's cost-benefit analysis, required by the statute under which the rule was promulgated, inadequate. Among other things, the court believed that the SEC analyzed costs and benefits of the rule inconsistently, underestimated the costs of board opposition to stockholder nominees, and failed to consider sufficiently prospects that particular types of stockholders might use the rule to further their own interests at the expense of stockholders generally.
The SEC has not yet determined whether it will appeal or acquiesce in the decision.
Loeb & Loeb’s Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Task Force monitors key issues surrounding approval of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that are relevant to a broad spectrum of firm clients in the financial services industry. The multidisciplinary Task Force is comprised of attorneys across core practice areas - including general corporate, private equity, securities, mergers and acquisitions, consumer protection and banking and finance - who are focused on analyzing the historic legislation and interpreting the significant business implications for financial institutions and commercial companies nationwide.
This client alert is a publication of Loeb & Loeb LLP and is intended to provide information on recent legal developments. This client alert does not create or continue an attorney client relationship nor should it be construed as legal advice or an opinion on specific situations.
Circular 230 Disclosure: To assure compliance with Treasury Department rules governing tax pactice, we inform you that any advice (including in any attachment) (1) was not written and is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalty that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (2) may not be used in connection with promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein.