){kind=logo}
A dozen current and former female college athletes have challenged the recently finalized $2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement that compensates current and former college athletes who missed out on the opportunity to monetize their name, image and likeness (NIL) and allows schools to pay student-athletes directly.
The women say the deal violates Title IX, which bans sex-based discrimination in education, because it overwhelmingly favors men’s football and basketball players, whose sports are the largest sources of revenue in college sports.
In this Chicago Daily Law Bulletin article authored by Douglas Masters, managing partner of Loeb & Loeb’s Chicago office, and Advanced Media & Technology partner Seth Rose, the writers examine how ongoing Title IX challenges to the $2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement could reshape NIL revenue sharing and expose colleges, the NCAA and related entities to expanded gender-equity litigation
The women say the deal violates Title IX, which bans sex-based discrimination in education, because it overwhelmingly favors men’s football and basketball players, whose sports are the largest sources of revenue in college sports.
In this Chicago Daily Law Bulletin article authored by Douglas Masters, managing partner of Loeb & Loeb’s Chicago office, and Advanced Media & Technology partner Seth Rose, the writers examine how ongoing Title IX challenges to the $2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement could reshape NIL revenue sharing and expose colleges, the NCAA and related entities to expanded gender-equity litigation
-
-
合伙人