Skip to content

It looks like we may have content for your preferred language. Would you like to view this page in English?

Bankruptcy Court Refuses to Dismiss Marijuana Industry Debtor Chapter 11 Case

In re The Hacienda Company, LLC, No. 2:22-bk-15163, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (Judge Neil W. Bason) denied a motion to dismiss the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case despite finding that the marijuana-industry debtor was engaged in an ongoing, post-petition violation of the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

The Hacienda court's refusal to dismiss this marijuana industry case — on two separate occasions — and instead to confirm the Chapter 11 plan, represents a departure from the vast majority of bankruptcy court decisions, which reached the opposite result: dismissing bankruptcy cases based on perceived violations of federal drug laws alone. See, e.g., In re: Way to Grow, Inc., 610 B.R. 338 (D. Colo. 2019); Burton v. Maney (In re Burton), 610 B.R. 633 (9th Cir. BAP 2020).

In this Reuter’s article authored by Loeb & Loeb Restructuring and Bankruptcy partners Schuyler Carroll and Bethany Simmons and associate Noah Weingarten, the writers analyze the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's refusal to dismiss a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, emphasizing that a violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) does not automatically warrant dismissal, and considering the interests of innocent creditors and potential post-petition efforts to address violations.

To read the full article, please visit Reuter’s website.