Employers in California may no longer ask or require employees or applicants to provide their log-in credentials for social media sites such as Facebook, Tumblr and Twitter. California's Social Media Privacy Act, one of the most comprehensive social media privacy laws in the nation, went into effect on Jan. 1, 2013, and adds provisions to California's existing Labor Code that prohibit all employers - both private and public - from demanding usernames or passwords for the purpose of accessing personal social media accounts or from requiring an employee or applicant to access personal social media in the presence of the employer or to divulge any personal social media. Under Assembly Bill 1844, employers may not discipline, discharge, threaten those actions, or otherwise retaliate against an existing or prospective employee for failing to comply with a demand that violates the law. The law does not prohibit employers from demanding credentials to access an employer-provided piece of equipment, however.
While the amendment to the state's Labor Code expressly provides that the California Labor Commissioner is not required to investigate or determine any violation of the act, employers that violate the act still face liability for damages in private civil actions for harassment or discrimination.
For more information about the content of this alert, please contact Ieuan Jolly.
This client alert is a publication of Loeb & Loeb LLP and is intended to provide information on recent legal developments. This client alert does not create or continue an attorney client relationship nor should it be construed as legal advice or an opinion on specific situations.
Circular 230 Disclosure: To assure compliance with Treasury Department rules governing tax practice, we inform you that any advice (including in any attachment) (1) was not written and is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalty that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (2) may not be used in connection with promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein.
While the amendment to the state's Labor Code expressly provides that the California Labor Commissioner is not required to investigate or determine any violation of the act, employers that violate the act still face liability for damages in private civil actions for harassment or discrimination.
For more information about the content of this alert, please contact Ieuan Jolly.
This client alert is a publication of Loeb & Loeb LLP and is intended to provide information on recent legal developments. This client alert does not create or continue an attorney client relationship nor should it be construed as legal advice or an opinion on specific situations.
Circular 230 Disclosure: To assure compliance with Treasury Department rules governing tax practice, we inform you that any advice (including in any attachment) (1) was not written and is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalty that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (2) may not be used in connection with promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein.